hmo
7b26c373d1
Three issues from zhiwei's strategy report: 1. '37 reassess all timed out (subprocess 60s)': real cause is per-call LLM latency exceeding the 60s per-subprocess limit during the key5-dead/ gateway-unstable window. NOT 'no concurrency control' as reported (60s is per stock, not for the batch). Fixes: per-call timeout 60->240s (LLM cold-start is 20-100s), and cap AUTO_REASSESS batch to 5 stocks per run with remainder continuing next run (was unbounded serial calls that also blew the 120s cron script window). 2. '15 stocks entry-zone center wrongly 97.0': quality gates had no zone-sanity-vs-price check, so bad data (bad quote or LLM template output) could be written freely. New GATE_ZONE_SANITY (CRITICAL): zone center must be within 0.3x-3x of current price. Verified: rejects the exact 97-center-vs-5.69-price corruption, passes legit zones. 3. 'reassess overwrites manual SQL fixes': true by design; with GATE_ZONE_SANITY at write time, reassess can no longer overwrite good values with garbage - invalid writes get rejected + flagged instead.
19 lines
826 B
Python
19 lines
826 B
Python
import sqlite3
|
|
conn = sqlite3.connect('/home/hmo/MoFin/data/mofin.db')
|
|
conn.row_factory = sqlite3.Row
|
|
|
|
codes = ['000711', '603766', '600617', '688271', '688608']
|
|
for code in codes:
|
|
r = conn.execute(
|
|
"SELECT code, name, entry_low, entry_high, substr(full_analysis,1,1200) as fa, "
|
|
"reassessed_at, updated_at FROM holding_strategies WHERE code=? AND status='active'",
|
|
(code,)).fetchone()
|
|
if r:
|
|
print(f"=== {r['code']} {r['name']} 区{r['entry_low']}~{r['entry_high']} updated={r['updated_at']} reassessed={r['reassessed_at']}")
|
|
fa = r['fa'] or ''
|
|
# 找买入区间相关行
|
|
for line in fa.split('\n'):
|
|
if any(k in line for k in ['买入区间', '止损', '止盈', '综合结论']):
|
|
print(' ', line[:120])
|
|
print()
|
|
conn.close() |